Why diversity and inclusion matter
Executive summary
Research from Catalyst and around the world has found that diversity1 and inclusion2 benefit individuals, organizations, teams, and society. The following data and findings are selected from a vast body of research on the benefits of diversity and inclusion in the workplace.
Catalyst has organized these findings into four areas in which diversity and inclusion have significant impact: talent, innovation and group performance, reputation and responsibility, and financial performance.
Talent
Innovation and group performance
Reputation and responsibility
Financial performance
Additional resources
Next steps
The New York Times, “From Inclusion to Support: How to Build a Better Workplace,” June 17, 2019.
Frances Taplett, Matt Krentz, Justin Dean, and Gabrielle Novacek, “Diversity Is Just the First Step. Inclusion Comes Next,” The Boston Consulting Group, April 24, 2019.
Research
Catalyst, How to Get DEI Buy-In: 5 Actions Leaders Should Take.
Catalyst, Why Diversity Matters (July 23, 2013).
John M. Amis, Johanna Mair, and Kamal A. Munir, “The Organizational Reproduction of Inequality,” Academy of Management Annals, vol. 14, no. 1 (2020): p. 1-36.
Sundiatu Dixon-Fyle, Kevin Dolan, Vivian Hunt, and Sara Prince, Diversity Wins: How Inclusion Matters (McKinsey & Company, May 19, 2020).
Katherine W. Phillips, “How Diversity Makes Us Smarter,” Scientific American, October 1, 2014.
Sodexo, Sodexo’s Gender Balance Study 2018: Expanded Outcomes Over 5 Years (2019).
Steven Turban, Dan Wu, and Letian (LT) Zhang, “Research: When Gender Diversity Makes Firms More Productive,” Harvard Business Review, February 11, 2019.
How to cite this product: Catalyst, Quick take: Why diversity and inclusion matter (June 24, 2020).
Endnotes
- Catalyst does not have a single definition of diversity. Because it is different for each organization and region, we encourage organizations to create and own their unique definition of diversity. Diversity might encompass the visible (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity) or the invisible qualities (e.g., personality, family background, education, personal style) that make individuals unique. When defining diversity, it is helpful for organizations to assume that diversity is the heterogeneity among all of us and therefore applies to everyone. It is much more inclusive than calling out any one segment of the population as “diverse,” which has the effect of marginalizing others from both the conversation and the solution.
- Practitioners and researchers define inclusion in many different ways. Some definitions focus on valuing differences. Others emphasize finding common ground to promote cohesion. Psychological theory, as well as Catalyst’s research, gives credence to both these points of view. Our research reveals five hallmarks of inclusion. When employees experience inclusion at work, they report feeling valued, trusted, authentic, and psychologically safe—in latitude, meaning they are free to hold differing views and make mistakes without being penalized, and in risk-taking, feeling secure enough to address tough issues or take risks. Dnika J. Travis, Emily Shaffer, and Jennifer Thorpe-Moscon, Getting Real About Inclusive Leadership: Why Change Starts With You (Catalyst, 2019).
- Juan M. Madera, Linnea Ng, Jane M. Sundermann, and Mikki Hebl, “Top Management Gender Diversity and Organizational Attraction: When and Why It Matters, ”Archives of Scientific Psychology, vol. 7, no. 1 (2019): p. 90-101; Cara C. Maurer and Israr Qureshi, “Not Just Good for Her: A Temporal Analysis of the Dynamic Relationship Between Representation of Women and Collective Employee Turnover, ” Organization Studies (2019).
- Cara C. Maurer and Israr Qureshi, “Not Just Good for Her: A Temporal Analysis of the Dynamic Relationship Between Representation of Women and Collective Employee Turnover,” Organization Studies (2019).
- Juan M. Madera, Linnea Ng, Jane M. Sundermann, and Mikki Hebl, “Top Management Gender Diversity and Organizational Attraction: When and Why It Matters,” Archives of Scientific Psychology, vol. 7, no. 1 (2019): p. 90-101.
- Jennifer Thorpe-Moscon, Alixandra Pollack, and Olufemi Olu-Lafe, Empowering Workplaces Combat Emotional Tax for People of Colour in Canada (Catalyst, 2019).
- Dnika J. Travis, Emily Shaffer, and Jennifer Thorpe-Moscon, Getting Real About Inclusive Leadership: Why Change Starts With You (Catalyst, 2019).
- International Labour Organization, Women in Business and Management: The Business Case for Change (2019): p. 21.
- Sean McCallaghan, Leon T.B. Jackson, and Marita M. Heyns, “Examining the Mediating Effect of Diversity Climate on the Relationship Between Destructive Leadership and Employee Attitudes,” Journal of Psychology in Africa, vol. 29, no. 6 (2019): p. 563-569; Elissa L. Perry and Aitong Li, “Diversity Climate in Organizations,” in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management (Oxford University Press, 2020).
- Elissa L. Perry and Aitong Li, “Diversity Climate in Organizations,” in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management (Oxford University Press, 2020).
- Helen H. Yu and David Lee, “Gender and Public Organization: A Quasi-Experimental Examination of Inclusion on Experiencing and Reporting Wrongful Behavior in the Workplace,” Public Personnel Management, vol. 49, no. 1 (2020): p. 3-28.
- Luu Trong Tuan, Chris Rowley, and Vo Thanh Thao, “Addressing Employee Diversity to Foster Their Work Engagement," Journal of Business Research, vol. 95 (2019): p. 303-315.
- Juliet Bourke and Andrea Espedido, “Why Inclusive Leaders Are Good for Organizations, and How to Become One,” Harvard Business Review, March 29, 2019.
- Rocío Lorenzo, Nicole Voigt, Karin Schetelig, Annika Zawadzki, Isabell M. Welpe, and Prisca Brosi, The Mix That Matters: Innovation Through Diversity (The Boston Consulting Group, 2017).
- Sarah E. Gaither, Evan P. Apfelbaum, Hannah J. Birnbaum, Laura G. Babbitt, and Samuel R. Sommers, “Mere Membership in Racially Diverse Groups Reduces Conformity,” Social Psychology and Personality Science, vol. 9, no. 4 (2018): p. 402-410; Astrid C. Homan, “Dealing with Diversity in Workgroups: Preventing Problems and Promoting Potential,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 13, no. 5 (2019).
- The American Psychological Association defines groupthink as “a strong concurrence-seeking tendency that interferes with effective group decision making. Symptoms include apparent unanimity, illusions of invulnerability and moral correctness, biased perceptions of the outgroup, interpersonal pressure, self-censorship, and defective decision-making strategies. Causes are thought to include group cohesion and isolation, poor leadership, and the stress involved in making decisions.” American Psychological Association, “Groupthink,” APA Dictionary of Psychology (2020); Sarah E. Gaither, Evan P. Apfelbaum, Hannah J. Birnbaum, Laura G. Babbitt, and Samuel R. Sommers, “Mere Membership in Racially Diverse Groups Reduces Conformity,” Social Psychology and Personality Science, vol. 9, no. 4 (2018): p. 402-410.
- Astrid C. Homan, “Dealing with Diversity in Workgroups: Preventing Problems and Promoting Potential,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 13, no. 5 (2019).
- Alison Reynolds and David Lewis, “Teams Solve Problems Faster When They’re More Cognitively Diverse,” Harvard Business Review (March 30, 2017).
- Matthew Corritore, Amir Goldberg, and Sameer B. Srivastava, “The New Analytics of Culture,” Harvard Business Review (January-February 2020).
- Hun Whee Lee, Jin Nam Choi, and Seongsu Kim, “Does Gender Diversity Help Teams Constructively Manage Status Conflict? An Evolutionary Perspective of Status Conflict, Team Psychological Safety, and Team Creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 144 (2018): p. 187-199.
- Ream A. Shoreibah, Greg W. Marshall, and Jule B. Gassenheimer, “Toward a Framework for Mixed-Gender Selling Teams and the Impact of Increased Female Presence on Team Performance: Thought Development and Propositions," Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 77 (February 2019): p. 4-12.
- Shelley Zalis, “Inclusive Ads Are Affecting Consumer Behavior, According to New Research," Think with Google, November 2019.
- Tanja Rabl, María del Carmen Triana, Seo-Young Bryun, and Laura Bosch, “Diversity Management Efforts as an Ethical Responsibility: How Employees’ Perceptions of an Organizational Integration and Learning Approach to Diversity Affect Employee Behavior,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 161 (2020): p. 531-550.
- Benjalux Sakunasingha, Pornsit Jiraporn, and Ali Uyar, “Which CSR Activities Are More Consequential? Evidence from the Great Recession,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 27 (2018): p. 161-168.
- Aida Sijamic Wahid, “The Effects and the Mechanisms of Board Gender Diversity: Evidence from Financial Manipulation,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 159 (2019): p. 705-725.
- Young Zik Shin, Jeung-Yoon Chang, Keyeongmin Jeon, and Hyunpyo Kim, “Female Directors on the Board and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Korea”; Asian Business Management (2019).
- Jie Chen, Woon Sau Leung, Wei Song, and Marc Georgen, “Research: When Women Are on Boards, Male CEOs Are Less Overconfident," Harvard Business Review, September 12, 2019; Jie Chen, Woon Sau Leung, Wei Song, and Marc Georgen, “Why Female Board Representation Matters: The Role of Female Directors in Reducing Male CEO Overconfidence,” Journal of Empirical Finance, vol. 52 (2019): p. 70-90.
- Miriam Schwartz-Ziv, “Gender and Board Activeness: The Role of a Critical Mass,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 52, no. 2 (2017): p. 751-780.
- Yaoyao Fan, Yuxiang Jiang, Xuezhi Zhang, and Yue Zhou, “Women on Boards and Bank Earnings Management: From Zero to Hero," Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 107 (2019).
- Karen M.Y. Lai, Bin Srinidhi, Ferdinand A. Gul, and Judy S.L. Tsui, “Board Gender Diversity, Auditor Fees, and Auditor Choice,” Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 34, no. 3 (2017): p. 1681-1714.
- Binay K. Adhikari, Anup Agrawal, and James Malm, “Do Women Managers Keep Firms Out of Trouble? Evidence from Corporate Litigation and Policies,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 67, no. 1 (2019): p. 202-225.
- Cristina Banahan and Gabriel Hasson, “Across the Board Improvements: Gender Diversity and ESG Performance,” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, September 6, 2018.
- Paula Loop and Paul DeNicola, “You’ve Committed to Increasing Gender Diversity on Your Board. Here’s How to Make It Happen," Harvard Business Review, February 18, 2019.
- Steven A. Creek, Kristine M. Kuhn, and Arvin Sahaym, “Board Diversity and Employee Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Progressive Programs,” Group & Organization Management (2017).
- David M. Mayer, Madeline Ong, Scott Sonenshein, and Susan J. Ashford, “To Get Companies to Take Action on Social Issues, Emphasize Morals, Not the Business Case,” Harvard Business Review, February 14, 2019.
- Vijay Eswaran, “The Business Case for Diversity Is Now Overwhelming,” World Economic Forum, April 29, 2019.
- For a full overview of research on diversity and financial performance, see: Catalyst, Why Diversity and Inclusion Matter: Financial Performance (June 24, 2020).
- Great Place to Work Hidden Pieces of the D&I Puzzle (2020).